ArchWeek - Up on the Roof
-

Kevin Matthews - Posts: 916
- Joined: Tue Apr 13, 2004 9:15 pm
- Location: Eugene, Oregon
Re: ArchWeek - Up on the Roof
Interesting example. Way to go! I wonder what the impetus was to build in this way, rather than demolish and rebuild.
Of course, this sort of intensive inner city development is not uncommon in major European cities. Unfortunately in the UK new building attracts a tax exemption, while refurbishment of existing buildings does not.
Of course, this sort of intensive inner city development is not uncommon in major European cities. Unfortunately in the UK new building attracts a tax exemption, while refurbishment of existing buildings does not.
- lekizz
- millennium club
- Posts: 1236
- Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2006 9:22 am
- Location: UK
Re: ArchWeek - Up on the Roof
Unfortunately in the UK new building attracts a tax exemption, while refurbishment of existing buildings does not.
Wow, that sounds pretty backwards from some fairly obvious broad public policy goals.
-

Kevin - Site Admin
- Posts: 1878
- Joined: Tue Apr 13, 2004 6:59 pm
- Location: Eugene, Oregon
Re: ArchWeek - Up on the Roof
Yes, it is completely perverse! Presumably a new addition on an existing building gets the tax exemption, but I'm not sure. There is a lot of 'facadism' in UK cities, which more or less equates to completely gutting and demolishing old buildings, retaining only the front wall. But I think our historic built environment is often only retained because of strict planning conditions and/or eccentric clients...
- lekizz
- millennium club
- Posts: 1236
- Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2006 9:22 am
- Location: UK
4 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests