City Club Land Use Planning Discussion Talkback

Eugene, Oregon, USA: A forum for Friends of Eugene and discussion of Eugene-related land use, transportation, livability, environment, economic justice, and environmental quality issues.

City Club Land Use Planning Discussion Talkback

Postby Kevin » Mon Apr 17, 2006 10:46 pm

On April 7 and April 14, 2006, four Eugene, Oregon interest groups participated in a pair of panel presentations and discussion on what's not right with land use planning in Eugene, and how we can go about doing better.

You're invited to share your own thoughts here!
User avatar
Kevin
Site Admin
 
Posts: 1885
Joined: Tue Apr 13, 2004 6:59 pm
Location: Eugene, Oregon

Postby Kevin » Mon Apr 17, 2006 10:47 pm

Here are some specific items for improvement, listed by a Friends of Eugene board member.


1. Reestablish the CIC, with funding so it can develop other ways to
get citizen input.

2. Adopt the "Albany Plan" requiring developers to meet with the
neighborhoods as apart of their application process.

3. Start a program to create/redo refinement plans for every
neighborhood and then put them on a review schedule so they get
reassesed about every 3-5 years

4. City wide plans need to be developed within the 2 year tenure of a
single City Council.

5. Avoid (like the plague or bird flu) scheduling public workshops,
hearings or information sessions during the summer months and from
the middle of November and New Years.

6. adopt more then just the policy statements

7. Longer documents require more time for the public at a hearing.

8. Controverisal subjects require more time for members of the public
not less.

9 Consider public interest (i.e. likely turn out) when scheduling City
Council Meetings. There is great advantage to have a hearing
regarding items of interest even if it is not required by law. Schedule
the public hearing before the action is put on the consent calender.
Monday's meeting could have been much shorter it people did not
need to use the public forum to address the bond issue.
User avatar
Kevin
Site Admin
 
Posts: 1885
Joined: Tue Apr 13, 2004 6:59 pm
Location: Eugene, Oregon

Postby Kevin » Mon Apr 17, 2006 10:52 pm

And in my presentation for FoE on Friday, April 14, I suggested these:

- Really think in terms of triple bottom line budgeting throughout the city.

- Really use the IAP2 spectrum for public participation. (Note: There is no place on the participation spectrum for 'selling ideas to the public'!)

- Reinstitute the Citizen Involvement Committee (CIC). Planning staff need that support!

- And most of all, use collaborative, comprehensive, community planning as the prevailing planning approach city-wide. "Design with Nature", plus open, forthright, ground-up collaboration.
User avatar
Kevin
Site Admin
 
Posts: 1885
Joined: Tue Apr 13, 2004 6:59 pm
Location: Eugene, Oregon


Return to Friends of Eugene Forum

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests

User Control Panel

Login

Who is online

In this forum zone there are 2 users online :: 0 registered, 0 hidden and 2 guests (based on users active over the past 5 minutes)
Most users ever online was 508 on Thu Jun 25, 2009 11:21 am

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests
DesignCommunity   ·   ArchitectureWeek   ·   Great Buildings   ·   Archiplanet   ·   Books   ·   Blogs   ·   Search
Special thanks to our sustaining subscribers Building Design UK, Building Design News UK, and Building Design Tenders UK.