or analog???????????????

Discussion of architectural photography in general, plus postings for participating photographers in the Artifice Images licensing pool.

Postby Confused » Thu Mar 26, 2009 7:45 pm

I prefer digi to film simply for ease of use. I know digital has taken the 'magic' out of the whole process, but to be able to take an image and have it uploaded online within minutes is just unbeatable.

I first fell in love with digital when I purchased of photo of me in a Superbike race, and could see a Bee in the background. Truly amazing.
Posts: 1
Joined: Thu Mar 26, 2009 6:45 pm

Postby eddydarmawan » Mon Apr 06, 2009 4:37 am

i prefered digital camera, because now we working drawing and presentation in digital media, with digital camera, we get digital image, and minimize a few step processing ( printing, scanning ) that can make the quality lower than the original
Posts: 3
Joined: Wed Sep 05, 2007 11:12 pm

How digital cameras can affect architecture

Postby iphilblue » Thu Aug 20, 2009 4:56 pm

On a related topic, I read about Robert Burley, a Canadian architect who studies how digital photography has led to the destruction of many Kodak processing plants: ... f-darkness

Interesting how in this case technological developments in photography have an impact on the architectural world
Posts: 8
Joined: Mon Oct 27, 2008 4:14 pm


Return to Architectural Photography

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests

User Control Panel


Who is online

In this forum zone there are 5 users online :: 0 registered, 0 hidden and 5 guests (based on users active over the past 5 minutes)
Most users ever online was 593 on Sat May 26, 2018 5:18 pm

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests
DesignCommunity   ·   ArchitectureWeek   ·   Great Buildings   ·   Archiplanet   ·   Books   ·   Blogs   ·   Search
Special thanks to our sustaining subscribers Building Design UK, Building Design News UK, and Building Design Tenders UK.