|
View previous topic :: View next topic
|
| Author |
Message |
maxmoy
Joined: 20 Jul 2004
Posts: 89
|
 Posted: Tue Jul 20, 2004 9:21 am Post subject: Is UT Austin TRADITIONAL and BORING??? |
    |
|
| Can anybody comment on the "avant-gardness" of this school? So far, I think it is quite technical, pragmatic and boring. But I might just go there this Fall..... Please, anyone? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
rizzdizzle
Joined: 13 Jun 2004
Posts: 36
|
| Posted: Tue Jul 20, 2004 9:39 am Post subject: |
|
|
| your predictions are probably correct....i doubt its avant-garde.....or even just the least bit conceptual |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
hkboy313
Joined: 20 Jul 2004
Posts: 6
Location: Hong Kong, Texas
|
| Posted: Tue Jul 20, 2004 11:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
i am not so sure what that means but..i think its more traditional...more hand drawings ... in houston...U of H ... we work both ways, depends on prof, or what he/she likes (usually doesnt matter if its a clean drawing).
i think traditional way is losing...more computer CAD is in. but i always draw by hand (plan, section...everything) you can see the whole pictures at a bigger scale rather on a 19" comp monitor...of cos it is my opinion.
good luck going to UT  i wish i can go there too but i am 4th yr in U of Houston (UT arch is a good school..so good they dont want to accept me when i first applied  ehehe) |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
blogger
del.icio.us
digg
slashdot
