|
View previous topic :: View next topic
|
| Author |
Message |
Confused
Joined: 26 Mar 2009
Posts: 1
|
 Posted: Thu Mar 26, 2009 4:45 pm Post subject: |
    |
|
I prefer digi to film simply for ease of use. I know digital has taken the 'magic' out of the whole process, but to be able to take an image and have it uploaded online within minutes is just unbeatable.
I first fell in love with digital when I purchased of photo of me in a Superbike race, and could see a Bee in the background. Truly amazing.
_________________
Accident Investigation |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
eddydarmawan
Joined: 05 Sep 2007
Posts: 3
|
| Posted: Mon Apr 06, 2009 1:37 am Post subject: |
|
|
| i prefered digital camera, because now we working drawing and presentation in digital media, with digital camera, we get digital image, and minimize a few step processing ( printing, scanning ) that can make the quality lower than the original |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
iphilblue
Joined: 27 Oct 2008
Posts: 8
|
| Posted: Thu Aug 20, 2009 1:56 pm Post subject: How digital cameras can affect architecture |
|
|
On a related topic, I read about Robert Burley, a Canadian architect who studies how digital photography has led to the destruction of many Kodak processing plants: http://cca.qc.ca/en/exhibitions/581-robert-burley-the-disappearance-of-darkness
Interesting how in this case technological developments in photography have an impact on the architectural world |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
blogger
del.icio.us
digg
slashdot
