why bldg appears as geometrical form ?

Goto page 1, 2  Next
 
Post new topic Reply to topic
   ArchitectureWeek DesignCommunity Forum Index » Architecture Forum
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
singleye



Joined: 03 Feb 2006
Posts: 62

PostPosted: Thu Jan 31, 2008 11:33 am    Post subject: why bldg appears as geometrical form ? Reply with quoteFind all posts by singleye

maybe thousand people has asked that, but it came to my mind again.

if bldg mimic the nature, then in nature, there're geometries and there are random shapes, but why bldgs appears as geometrical forms only? (mostly)

thanks.
Back to top
View user's profileSend private message    share:   blogger     del.icio.us     digg     slashdot    
lekizz
millennium club


Joined: 11 Jan 2006
Posts: 1074
Location: UK

PostPosted: Thu Jan 31, 2008 11:46 am    Post subject: Reply with quoteFind all posts by lekizz

Obviously you are correct, most buildings are rectilinear in form, probably because most building materials and components are rectilinear too. Engineering and construction is way more complicated with random curvy irregular shapes.

There was a looong thread recently about organic architecture. My definition of an architecture that is organic and refers to nature would be one that maybe weathers beautifully and sympathetically, one that displays elements of 'randomness' - wood grain, the mottling of bricks and stone, the signs of the human hand in the plasterwork... and don't forget the judicious use of natural daylight, natural ventilation, cooling and heating. And views out of course onto vegetation or landscape. It does not necessarily mean the building form has to look like a Gehry scribble.
Back to top
View user's profileSend private message    share:   blogger     del.icio.us     digg     slashdot    
JonBailey



Joined: 18 Oct 2007
Posts: 111

PostPosted: Sat Feb 02, 2008 10:48 am    Post subject: Reply with quoteFind all posts by JonBailey

yes, the reason that we use these modular peices is a direct result of the industrial age -- mass production of modular peices, which consequently produce rectalinear forms.

geometry IS found in nature, and it is up to us to decipher this geometry and see how we can learn from its meaning as it could apply to architecture.

with new digital fabrication techniques [in the information age] we can learn how to get away from mass produced modular peices, and rectalinear form, and learn how to build to customization better than ever than before, and at a lower cost.

_________________
Jon Bailey
a r c h i m o r p h
Back to top
View user's profileSend private messageSend e-mailVisit poster's website    share:   blogger     del.icio.us     digg     slashdot    
Kevin
Site Admin


Joined: 13 Apr 2004
Posts: 1117
Location: Eugene, Oregon

PostPosted: Mon Feb 04, 2008 9:00 am    Post subject: Reply with quoteFind all posts by Kevin

I guess there were still plenty of rectilinear buildings built before the age of mechanized industry and mass production...

http://www.GreatBuildings.com/buildings/Great_Pyramid.html

http://www.GreatBuildings.com/buildings/The_Parthenon.html

http://www.GreatBuildings.com/buildings/Doges_Palace.html

http://www.GreatBuildings.com/buildings/Le_Petit_Trianon.html

...etc.
Back to top
View user's profileSend private messageSend e-mailVisit poster's website    share:   blogger     del.icio.us     digg     slashdot    
JonBailey



Joined: 18 Oct 2007
Posts: 111

PostPosted: Mon Feb 04, 2008 9:14 am    Post subject: Reply with quoteFind all posts by JonBailey

Yes this is true... this was due to classical proportioning systems...

both of these techniques are falling to the wayside

_________________
Jon Bailey
a r c h i m o r p h
Back to top
View user's profileSend private messageSend e-mailVisit poster's website    share:   blogger     del.icio.us     digg     slashdot    
Kevin
Site Admin


Joined: 13 Apr 2004
Posts: 1117
Location: Eugene, Oregon

PostPosted: Mon Feb 04, 2008 10:22 am    Post subject: Reply with quoteFind all posts by Kevin

Ouch, that was quick!

Wink

Seriously, I have nothing against biomorphic and free-form architecture. And I'm super on innovation, creativity, and appropriate expression unfettered. But there are many more substantive and profound reasons for the various norms of building around the world than simply a couple of lines of glibly dismissed traditions. Whether we're trying to make beautiful blobs or beautiful boxes, for robust structures, let's try to be robust in how we analyze them.

Like, what about gravity, for instance, and its general tendency in a given local and Earth to pull "straight" down?

Might that have some influence on common building geometries, perhaps?
Back to top
View user's profileSend private messageSend e-mailVisit poster's website    share:   blogger     del.icio.us     digg     slashdot    
birgco



Joined: 01 May 2007
Posts: 302

PostPosted: Mon Feb 04, 2008 4:52 pm    Post subject: Reply with quoteFind all posts by birgco

Why do buildings appear mostly in geometrical forms??


Veering off the superhighway of conventionality just a little bit onto the dusty trail of less common geometric forms means time and therefore costs ballon exponentially, and if you have ever tried to build an arched door way, a turret, a barrel ceiling, a curved wall or a dome.............

ya wouldn't ask............ Crying or Very sad
Back to top
View user's profileSend private message    share:   blogger     del.icio.us     digg     slashdot    
Landy



Joined: 15 Dec 2005
Posts: 445

PostPosted: Mon Feb 04, 2008 5:11 pm    Post subject: Reply with quoteFind all posts by Landy

oh no!!! please not another blob architecture thread
Back to top
View user's profileSend private message    share:   blogger     del.icio.us     digg     slashdot    
djswan



Joined: 17 Aug 2007
Posts: 767
Location: Montana, USA

PostPosted: Mon Feb 04, 2008 9:45 pm    Post subject: Reply with quoteFind all posts by djswan



What's geometry?

_________________
n/a
Back to top
View user's profileSend private message    share:   blogger     del.icio.us     digg     slashdot    
barryhunter



Joined: 14 Dec 2007
Posts: 16

PostPosted: Thu Sep 25, 2008 5:12 pm    Post subject: Geometric architecture Reply with quoteFind all posts by barryhunter

Mankind is fascinated with geometry. A sense of order. Even the branch hut above is an ordered assembly of branches. Its hard wired to our brains. I am as into wild forms as anyone, but before we go there with architecture lets think if those shapes are really what we want. I am typeing this on a rectangular computer, with square keys, while drinking from a round cup, etc, etc.
Back to top
View user's profileSend private message    share:   blogger     del.icio.us     digg     slashdot    
J.Saravana Balaji



Joined: 25 Dec 2007
Posts: 21
Location: India

PostPosted: Thu Sep 25, 2008 10:44 pm    Post subject: Reply with quoteFind all posts by J.Saravana Balaji

A geometrical Shaped buildings are functionally good in performance.Human body and the nature might not be in perfect geometry but if you observe the movement of any living organisim they will be geometric.
e.g if you swing your arm it generates a perfect circle with your shoulder as centre.and
you might have observed a flight of birds which form a triangle shape while flying.
Thats why we feel very uncomfortable in a organic shaped buildings.
Back to top
View user's profileSend private message    share:   blogger     del.icio.us     digg     slashdot    
djswan



Joined: 17 Aug 2007
Posts: 767
Location: Montana, USA

PostPosted: Sun Sep 28, 2008 9:25 am    Post subject: Reply with quoteFind all posts by djswan

It's hardwired into our brains, and chimps weave a bed at night, and eat termites in termite mounds, and bee honey after diner. We're not the only builders using geometry.

That's one of my favorite images, I dig the canoe. I've lived it, with a tent, inflatable raft and duct tape for both raft and tent.



I've posted this pic before on another topic, didn't get much responce, has the wiring gone bad in the geometry, the sense of order perhaps?

_________________
n/a
Back to top
View user's profileSend private message    share:   blogger     del.icio.us     digg     slashdot    
O-Archy



Joined: 18 Sep 2008
Posts: 14
Location: Victor, Idaho

PostPosted: Sun Sep 28, 2008 3:10 pm    Post subject: Reply with quoteFind all posts by O-Archy

DJ
That's a cool building, the owner-builder tragically died whilst constructing it...

Perhaps the main reason structures are rectilinear or 'simple' is due to the cost of something unique as well as the fact that zoning laws in urban areas dictate setbacks, heights, floor areas, etc, and that the financial, insurance and real estate industries are arch-conservative about being 'experimental' with the money being spent on somebodys magnum opus.

Another reason if the 'fear of the unknown' as most people want creature comforts, yes, eating honey after dinner could bee sweet, just as many people don't want their abodes to be 'out of step' with the neighborhood.
Sooo we end up with the sprawl like the foto you posted on another thread, plain vanilla, and boring built environments.

It was mentioned earlier in this thread about the classic proportioning systems being discarded, which is really tragic, these proportioning systems are grounded in long-term history, it's probably more of a design theory these days, like 20th century modernists devolving into post-modern, crashing into deconstructivism, now the blob- itorture, it's not really that pretty or maybe I should say,

"Commodity, Firmness and Delight'

_________________
"If the city is one of humankinds greatest achievements, it's uncontrolled evolution also can lead to desecration of both nature and the human spirit" -M.G. Marcus-1979
Back to top
View user's profileSend private message    share:   blogger     del.icio.us     digg     slashdot    
djswan



Joined: 17 Aug 2007
Posts: 767
Location: Montana, USA

PostPosted: Wed Oct 01, 2008 6:14 pm    Post subject: Reply with quoteFind all posts by djswan

Cool,

That structure scores an A+ on my coolness scale. It is not pretty or stout, but could still pass with a 2.51. It does tell a good story.

_________________
n/a
Back to top
View user's profileSend private message    share:   blogger     del.icio.us     digg     slashdot    
teamjdc



Joined: 25 Oct 2007
Posts: 291

PostPosted: Thu Oct 02, 2008 4:00 pm    Post subject: Reply with quoteFind all posts by teamjdc

Because we crave order.
Back to top
View user's profileSend private message    share:   blogger     del.icio.us     digg     slashdot    
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic Reply to topic
   ArchitectureWeek DesignCommunity Forum Index » Architecture Forum Page 1 of 2
Goto page 1, 2  Next

 




Latest Posts   ·   ArchWeek Jobs Board   ·   Classifieds   ·   User Galleries   ·   Scrapbook   ·   Open 3D Gallery
 Architecture Search   by name of Building, Architect, or Place:  
Buildings     Architects     Types & Styles     Places     Models     GB Image Index     ArchWeek Library
Professional Directory   Web Directory   Competitions   Conferences   Events & Exhibits     Products     Media Kit
DesignCommunity   ·   ArchWeek   ·   Great Buildings   ·   Archiplanet   ·   Books   ·   Blogs   ·   Free 3D   ·   Search
© 2004-2008 Artifice, Inc. · Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group
Thème myApple v2.0.1 créé par myTemplate