ArchitectureWeek DesignCommunity Forum Index » Open 3D CAD and Design Graphics Discussion

View previous topic :: View next topic
Author	Message
Yuqichi Joined: 17 Apr 2004 Posts: 5	Posted: Wed Dec 29, 2004 3:31 pm    Post subject: 3d MAX vs. 3d VIZ Trying to pick up a 3d program. Does anyone have any suggestions on which program is more well-suited for architecture? 3d MAX from Discreet or 3d VIZ from Autodesk Thanks!
Back to top	share:   blogger     del.icio.us     digg     slashdot
Jrog Joined: 04 Jul 2004 Posts: 13	Posted: Thu Dec 30, 2004 2:32 am    Post subject: 3d max would probably be better because its better known, and therefore more programs would probably be compatible with it, i've never even heard of the other one , but you should search for some reviews and ratings, they always help.
Back to top	share:   blogger     del.icio.us     digg     slashdot
Cole_21 Joined: 28 Sep 2004 Posts: 9 Location: Dallas, TX	Posted: Fri Jan 07, 2005 12:36 pm    Post subject: Is 3d MAX compatiable with ArchiCad?
Back to top	share:   blogger     del.icio.us     digg     slashdot
F700ES Joined: 23 Apr 2004 Posts: 113 Location: North Carolina	Posted: Fri Jan 07, 2005 8:11 pm    Post subject: AutoDesk Viz is built on the same application as 3D Studio Max except it is built more for Architecture istead of standard Digital Content Creation (DCC). There are no animation tools, character tools or other special features. http://www3.autodesk.com/adsk/files/4370887_VIZ2005_Compare_All_v2.pdf
Back to top	share:   blogger     del.icio.us     digg     slashdot
Mortimer77 Joined: 11 Jan 2005 Posts: 2	Posted: Tue Jan 11, 2005 7:24 am    Post subject: If your doing Architecture Vis would be better overall because of its autocad bias. I use Max and it's a world unto its own!!! If you want to create life like images then there is nothing better than Max!!! But be prepared to spend a couple of yrs to master it!!! Max has'nt got the accuracy of vis!
Back to top	share:   blogger     del.icio.us     digg     slashdot
cad*composer Joined: 30 Jan 2005 Posts: 1 Location: UAE/Philippines	Posted: Sun Jan 30, 2005 6:24 am    Post subject: For me I use 3D Max. if your talking of accuracy it can be. To make it easy use AutoCAD the transfer to Max for accuracy. Good luck _________________ cad*composer
Back to top	share:   blogger     del.icio.us     digg     slashdot
ca10ymanga Joined: 19 Apr 2005 Posts: 7 Location: philippines	Posted: Tue Apr 19, 2005 2:02 am    Post subject: using viz would be better if youre doing a still image or just a picture because of the time compare to max which i think is for animation and would take more time to render or create. but in terms of effect or resolution i believe they are pretty much the same. _________________ caloy
Back to top	share:   blogger     del.icio.us     digg     slashdot
YgaRas Joined: 06 Apr 2005 Posts: 8 Location: Indonesia, Asia	Posted: Wed Apr 20, 2005 10:10 am    Post subject: i use animation in MAX for my design presentations, max represents my thought 'bout the material, perspektif, lighting etc.. couple of years for mastering max????? just couple of weeks decide quickly.. you are going older&older _________________ _______________________________ why is designing difficult??
Back to top	share:   blogger     del.icio.us     digg     slashdot
3d Joined: 26 Apr 2005 Posts: 3 Location: Cheras	Posted: Tue Apr 26, 2005 7:10 pm    Post subject: max would be more appropriate if you want to add in effects or character animation. viz is more to architectural vizualization. however, whatever feature is in viz, you'll get in in max but at a cost. so, you need to think about what you want with your presentation.
Back to top	share:   blogger     del.icio.us     digg     slashdot
Display posts from previous: All Posts1 Day7 Days2 Weeks1 Month3 Months6 Months1 Year Oldest FirstNewest First

ArchitectureWeek DesignCommunity Forum Index » Open 3D CAD and Design Graphics Discussion

Page 1 of 1