|
View previous topic :: View next topic
|
| Author |
Message |
bocc
Joined: 13 Nov 2006 Posts: 1
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
lekizz millennium club
Joined: 11 Jan 2006 Posts: 1110 Location: UK
|
Posted: Mon Nov 13, 2006 8:19 am Post subject: |
    |
|
Yes, the actual end product has 'commercial developer' writen all over it, devoid of any unnecessary detail. What one person would call 'crisp modern detailling' others would call 'boring'.
But it has a warehouse aesthetic - you could imagine something similar next to a dock or canal with gantries to transfer the goods from the 'doors' on each floor, to and from the boat. At least the developer makes reference to vernacular language, of pitched roofs and a mixture of building shapes that fit to the road.
Certainly your sketchup drawing looks attractive, but more as a Georgian townhouse rather than a warehouse. And you would have to ask yourself why you have a strip of roof above your windows, what purpose would that serve? And it would add considerable time and cost to design and build. And twice as many large picture windows would increase your costs again, as well as make it more difficult to comply with the new government energy conservation regulations.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
mx2 millennium club
Joined: 18 Jan 2006 Posts: 1968 Location: Miami, Florida
|
Posted: Mon Nov 13, 2006 12:29 pm Post subject: |
    |
|
Good point lekizz...Architects don't always get to design what they feel is best, especially in terms of pure aesthetics. Most developes want to spend as little money as possible while acheiving just enough to get by...
mx2.5
_________________ *Art of Architecture: The conscious use of skill and creative imagination in the production of an aesthetic building.
*Science of Architecture: The calculated use of technical skill and knowledge in the construction of a functional building. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
fireboat
Joined: 01 Dec 2006 Posts: 5
|
Posted: Fri Dec 01, 2006 10:57 pm Post subject: |
    |
|
There was a time when quality and aesthetics were not an option, it was standard. The "now" building is very ugly, in my opnion. I can see why the extra windows and new shape would add lots of extra visual appeal to the building.
Too bad so many commercial builders and companies are strictly utilitarian. Wish they'd take pride in their properties.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ChooChoo
Joined: 30 Nov 2006 Posts: 55
|
Posted: Sat Dec 02, 2006 7:21 am Post subject: |
    |
|
don't you just love gables with no overhang? man, everyone does that here, I hate it.
your sketchup looks nice. are you just doing this for yourself?
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|